Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viewpon.TV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 23:53, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Viewpon.TV

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a minor, local TV show. The references are not reliable so the article is unverifiable and does not show how this show is notable. Prod contested without comment, so brought here for discussion. Sparthorse (talk) 05:45, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:20, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:20, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This website is a great source of Daily Deals in the San Francisco Bay Area, Sacramento, Lake Tahoe and other areas. They have been around for a few years and look like they will be around for many more to come. I think it is just as relevant as other shows and websites that are given Wiki pages. Here is an example of a local show http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Check,_Please! and here is an example of a Daily Deal website http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1saleaday and Viewpon.TV is both of those things working together. So I think it is fair that this wiki page remain. Thank you, a fan of the show. --Thebouncingsoul (talk) 18:34, 4 November 2011 (UTC)— Thebouncingsoul (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete - excessively promotional article for a local TV show of limited (if at all) notability. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:17, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 18:38, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.