Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vittra
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 00:24, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Vittra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No evidence of notability, nearly no context, no links... The Rolling Camel (talk) 23:34, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This article was nominated less than 12 hours after it was changed from a redirect (to “Vittra (album)”) to a company stub. The case presented against it by the nomination is therefore simply inappropriate. —SlamDiego←T 23:57, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. If no one expands the article further, renominate for deletion.The Locke (talk) 00:10, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 02:11, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment There are 19 hits on Google news for Vittra in the past month, all apparently in Swedish. There's no translation bar for me. If someone could get them translated, they appear like they would do the trick for achieving notability and the article could also be expanded.SilverserenC 02:21, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: One must be wary, because “vittra” is an ordinary, everyday Swedish word (with surprising meanings), as well as the name of the firm. —SlamDiego←T 03:15, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- (researches) Oh, I see what you mean. Yes, that could complicate things. Still though, that doesn't mean all the news articles are unaffiliated. Does anyone have the capability to translate them? SilverserenC 03:30, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: One must be wary, because “vittra” is an ordinary, everyday Swedish word (with surprising meanings), as well as the name of the firm. —SlamDiego←T 03:15, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, obviously. It took me a couple of minutes to find a good source that has been syndicated across many US publications. Such educational companies are analogous to school districts in the US which are always kept. TerriersFan (talk) 19:24, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —TerriersFan (talk) 19:46, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.