Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VoterMarch
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Louis J. Posner. There seems to be a general agreement amoung the uninvolved editors that this does no pass the notability guidelines for inclusion. There also seems to be an agreement for a redirect from this location to Louis J. Posner, the main organizer of the event. Guerillero | My Talk 05:23, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:spa|username}} ; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}} . |
- VoterMarch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:ORG. 90+% of the "coverage" of this group came between Jan. 10 and 21, 2001, consisted of a few sentences usually identifying and providing context to the source of a quote, and were mostly reprints of or generally based on the same AP wire piece that ran in that period. This isn't substantial coverage in reliable sources, and with the AP wire issue, there are questions about intellectual independence. The fact that so much of this coverage stems from the January 2001 protest also tees up a WP:ONEEVENT issue.
The sources in the article are not exceptions. Either they fit the concern above, are inconsequential mentions, or are simply unreliable. Searching LexisNexis for caps(singular(voter)) pre/1 caps(singular(march))
brings up fewer than 30 hits, including several false positives. One article is entirely about Les Souci, a few are about Lou Posner's 2008 arrest and conviction, and almost everything else is subject to the concerns mentioned above. The same happens with a search for "VoterMarch".
In short, we have here an organization that got a few trivial mentions in the press because people got quoted and identified as affiliated with the group, where all that coverage stemmed from the same protest in early 2001 that was attended by many, many other organizations. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 12:09, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete or redirect Though a well-crafted work product designed to give a greater-than-justified air of notability, the article lacks significant coverage. There are lots of cites, so at first blush, it looks notable. However,
- Archives-- self pubbed in deeper context of inaugral protests
- Montgomery and Santana-- short Posner quote
- BBC-- breif mention in deeper context of inaugaral protests
- Couloumbis-- brief Rogers quote in deeper context of inaugaral protests
- Daily News-- brief Rogers quote in deeper context of inaugaral protests
- Tuscaloosa News-- brief Rogers quote in deeper context of inaugaral protests
- CNN brief mention in deeper context of inaugaral protests
- NYTimes review of movie-- no mention of subject in deeper context of inaugaral protests
- ITVS-- no mention of subject in deeper context of inaugaral protests
- Clearly, the subject had a role in the Protests against President Bush fils, so while not notable enough for an article, there should be a redirect to an article about the protests (could not find one) or to First_inauguration_of_George_W._Bush#Controversy. Dlohcierekim 14:41, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Sockpuppet comments
|
---|
|
- Delete or redirect per Dlohcierekim above. Lots of passing mentions, nothing in depth, no persistence in coverage. JohnInDC (talk) 19:48, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Sockpuppet comments
|
---|
*Keep or redirect Zack Exley, former Chief Revenue Officer of the Wikipedia Foundation, was the founder of Counter Coup and was instrumental to the formation of Voter March, and he should be included in the VoterMarch article. See, Exley, Zack, "Organizing Online" [1] Organizing Online, How a former union organizer accidentally sparked a nationwide election protest movement, all via the Internet. Mother Jones — Dec. 9, 2000; See, We Will Not Get Over It, [2], by Jackson K. and Sharon M. Thoreau, Acknowledgments, p. 3: "We particularly thank ...Lou Posner of Voter March...Zack Exley of Counter Coup"170.170.59.139 (talk) 07:11, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Due to a Conflict of Interest with the article subject, I am not voting or offering my opinion as to keep, delete, redirect, or merge, but offer some comments. Voter March's initial event was in organizing the Counter-Inaugural Protest on January 20, 2001 in response to the 2000 Presidential election which was very controversial and contentious. After the 2000 Presidential election controversy, grassroots groups sprung up throughout the nation. Voter March was the umbrella grassroots group that organized hundreds of smaller groups throughout the nation to a large demonstration in Dupont Circle in Washington, DC. Voter March, International Action Center, National Organization of Women and National Action Network (Al Sharpton) were the main protest groups at the 2001 Presidential inauguration. Following the Counter-Inaugural Protest, Voter March engaged in other events, including the Voter Rights March on May 19, 2001 in Washington DC and San Francisco, and a series of speaking and book tours for BBC reporter and author Greg Palast and former prosecutor and author Vincent Bugliosi. Subsequently, Voter March was involved in the Anti-Iraq War movement, the 2004 Stolen Election campaign and the 2012 Tax Wall Street campaign. During 2001 and 2002, there were a large number of references to articles on Voter March. However, most of these articles have since been archived and are very difficult to retrieve. References to Voter March from secondary sources, are as follows:
Inaugural Protests Take Shape Published on Thursday, December 21, 2000 in the Washington Post, by David Montgomery and Arthur Santana, Common Dreams
Bush: Who's Protesting and Why, BBC News, January 20, 2001
Thousands Take to Street to Protest, Daily News, Bowling Green, AP, Jan. 2001. Inauguration Protests Largest Since Nixon, The Victoria Advocate, January 21, 2001. Thousands Take to Street in Protest of Inauguration, The Southeast Missourian, January 21, 2001. Gore Returns to Private Life, The Tuscaloosa News, AP, January 21, 2001.
Voters Rally for Electoral Reform, CNN Politics, May 19, 2001.
A Report form the Voter Rights March M19 Democratic Underground, May 22, 2001, by William Rivers Pitt.
Protest Bush Speaking at United Nations | What Really Happened.
There is also a large image gallery for Voter March at Wikimedia Commons at [14] which includes a picture of U.S. Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi speaking at the San Francisco Voter March event on May 19, 2001, at VoterMarch (talk) 10:02, 6 January 2014 (UTC) |
- Get rid of it per nominator! — Preceding unsigned comment added by IHeartUM (talk • contribs) 13:36, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Comment The above comment is not backed up by any independent reasoning and should be disregarded.108.176.141.200 (talk) 14:12, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:NOTABLE. And the comment made by 108.176.141.200 is baseless, and no one should pay attention to him, sorry, her! 166.205.50.87 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:41, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Sockpuppet comments
|
---|
|
- Merge into Louis Posner, which may merit its own AfD; but if it is kept, that's where any record of VM should go. – SJ + 02:04, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.