Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What Revit Wants (blog)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per general consensus about the subject's inadequate notability. Any interested editor may request (on my user talk page) that the article be restored to their user-space or the incubator for rework. --Der yck C. 18:57, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What Revit Wants (blog)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Non-notable blog. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 23:55, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 12:50, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This should not be deleted. It is notable because it was referenced in a significant printed work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.240.197.130 (talk) 05:29, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Surely being in a book means that it "has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" Wikipedia:Notability —Preceding unsigned comment added by A.anon.anon (talk • contribs) 05:38, 19 May 2011 (UTC) — A.anon.anon (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Delete - One mention in a book is insufficient to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:40, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A single passing reference in a single book doesn't constitute significant coverage. I didn't find anything else.--SPhilbrick T 13:37, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable. I suspect the author of the article knew that it was likely to be judged non-notable, since the article itself makes the pitch that it is notable! If a subject is notable, you demonstrate it via the citations, not by saying in the article "hey, look, this is a notable subject!" --MelanieN (talk) 02:48, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.