Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 March 21

< March 20	March 22 >

March 21

File:Officer Michael Thomas Slager.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Officer Michael Thomas Slager.jpg. I don't think there's any case for fair use at the moment, so it should be deleted on English Wikipedia and the decision deferred to Commons. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:49, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I commented on Commons. I also see no case for fair use (but I think one could be made, as this picture is used in one article and the biography of this person could probably be spun off if desired). Right now it seems that for some reason there is an assertion of public domain status but I do not understand it. By default, delete unless the licensing is put in order. Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I could find no statutory basis for the library's claims about SC state works being in the public domain. To the contrary, at least one case finds that a SC county can hold a copyright.[1] Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:16, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Houshang ostovar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:12, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Houshang ostovar.jpg. Discussion should happen on Commons. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:00, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The-Funnies-n1-Oct1936-230px.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:12, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused locally, superior version available at File:Funny1.jpg FASTILY 02:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MacKay Trophy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ ^xplicit 06:28, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative of a non-free trophy FASTILY 03:16, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If that trophy (the object) was created in 1911 and published in 1912 as the Wikipedia article and sources, then it would fall under {{PD-US}}.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:15, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think that Jo-Jo establishes enough reason to believe that this object is a copy of a public domain work. Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:16, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Plant0001.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:12, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader wrote in the file description: "temporarily uploaded to the reference desk. delete when question is answered". The file was uploaded in 2006. FASTILY 06:09, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tempsong0001.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:12, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary upload by user to ask a question at the reference desk. No foreseeable use FASTILY 06:10, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tony upsidedown.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:12, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused userphoto. No foreseeable use. Another variant exists as File:Tony11.jpg. Use {{Rotate text|180|[[File:Tony11.jpg]]}} if it is necessary to display a rotated copy of the image. Stefan2 (talk) 13:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Petri-ultimate.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:12, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure we don't need a non-free file to "illustrate the fact that Michala Petri has CDs". Victão Lopes ^Fala! 13:48, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Andrew-dela-serna.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:12, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused file. Sixth o f March 14:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Swimmer.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:12, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This file is used under fair use but there is no discussion or any context for it on the page it's used on at all. Thus it may fail WP:NFCC#8 . Worth also noting that it's shadowing a different Commons file. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:15, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Supergrouplogo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The local file is mostly identical to the Commons one, and according to commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Supergrouplogo.png the Commons file is judged to not be copyrightable even in the UK, rendering the local copy unnecessary. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:28, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Britain protects everything from signatures to minor font variations. The deletion request on Commons contains no evidence that the file doesn't meet the British threshold of originality. In particular, the choice to use an oversized '.' instead of a normally sized one could be problematic. --Stefan2 (talk) 01:16, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan2 To your knowledge, is there any documentation in a Wikimedia project about copyright status of font variations by country? I am just curious and know nothing about this. Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:19, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That would be c:COM:TOO and c:COM:SIG, but there is not much information available, and we lack information from most countries. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:14, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Noting here that I've re-nominated the logo for deletion.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:12, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.