Meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

doi:10.3748/wjg.v18.i45.6657

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 18, Issue 45

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (62469)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-3) series, Tables (1-3) series.

Item

Count

PDF

721

HTML

61298

Figures (1-3)

248

Tables (1-3)

202

Sum=62469

Dec 7, 2012 (publication date) through Nov 19, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (125)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta Analysis

World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2012; 18(45): 6657-6668
Published online Dec 7, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i45.6657

Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis

Study	Year	Country	Group	n	Male/female	Age (yr) (mean ± SD)	Matching^b	Study quality
Shimada et al[27]	2001	Japan	LLR	17	15/2	62 ± 9	1,3,4	*****
Shimada et al[27]	2001	Japan	OLR	38	24/14	63 ± 79	1,3,4	*****
Laurent et al[28]	2003	France	LLR	13	10/3	62.6 ± 9.5	1,3,4,5	******
Laurent et al[28]	2003	France	OLR	14	10/4	65.9 ± 5.5	1,3,4,5	******
Kaneko et al[29]	2005	Japan	LLR	30	18/12	59 ± 8	1,2,3,4,5	*****
Kaneko et al[29]	2005	Japan	OLR	28	18/10	61 ± 10	1,2,3,4,5	*****
Belli et al[30]	2007	Italy	LLR	23	13/10	59.5 ± 6.84	1,2,3,4,5	*******
Belli et al[30]	2007	Italy	OLR	23	14/9	62.4 ± 7.7	1,2,3,4,5	*******
Endo et al[31]	2009	Japan	LLR	10	8/2	72 ± 4	3,4	****
Endo et al[31]	2009	Japan	OLR	11	8/3	64 ± 2	3,4	****
Lai et al[32]	2009	China	LLR	25	18/7	59 (35-79)^a	1,3,4	******
Lai et al[32]	2009	China	OLR	33	21/12	59 (38-77)^a	1,3,4	******
Sarpel et al[11]	2009	United States	LLR	20	15/5	63.8 ± 10.3	1,3,4	*******
Sarpel et al[11]	2009	United States	OLR	56	45/11	58.3 ± 11.0	1,3,4	*******
Aldrighetti et al[33]	2010	Italy	LLR	16	11/5	65 ± 10	1,2,3,4,5	********
Aldrighetti et al[33]	2010	Italy	OLR	16	12/4	71 ± 6	1,2,3,4,5	********
Tranchart et al[10]	2010	France	LLR	42	15/27	63.7 ± 13.1	1,2,3,4,5	******
Tranchart et al[10]	2010	France	OLR	42	14/28	65.7 ± 7.1	1,2,3,4,5	******
Nguyen et al[34]	2011	United States	LLR	17	12/5	68	1,3,4,5	*****
Nguyen et al[34]	2011	United States	OLR	20	12/8	65	1,3,4,5	*****
Hu et al[16]	2011	China	LLR	30	20/10	46 ± 12	1,3,4	****
Hu et al[16]	2011	China	OLR	30	19/11	48 ± 15	1,3,4	****
Ker et al[19]	2011	China	LLR	11	92/24	58.31 ± 12.7	1,2	****
Ker et al[19]	2011	China	OLR	208	156/52	57.9 ± 11.2	1,2	****
Kim et al[20]	2011	South Korea	LLR	26	18/8	57.84 ± 9.66	1,2,3,4,5	******
Kim et al[20]	2011	South Korea	OLR	29	20/9	57.08 ± 9.78	1,2,3,4,5	******
Lee et al[17]	2011	China	LLR	33	24/9	59 (36-85)^a	1,2,4	*******
Lee et al[17]	2011	China	OLR	50	40/10	58.5 (32-81)^a	1,2,4	*******
Truant et al[18]	2011	France	LLR	36	31/5	60.6 ± 10.2	1,2,3,4	*******
Truant et al[18]	2011	France	OLR	53	47/6	63.3 ± 7.6	1,2,3,4	*******

LLR: Laparoscopic liver resection; OLR: Open liver resection.

^aMedian with range;

^b1: Age; 2: American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score; 3: Presence of cirrhosis; 4: Tumor size; 5: Type of liver resection.

Citation: Xiong JJ, Altaf K, Javed MA, Huang W, Mukherjee R, Mai G, Sutton R, Liu XB, Hu WM. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(45): 6657-6668
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i45/6657.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i45.6657