Crow vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,271,087 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.598. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 57.7 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 47.3%), per capita income ($31,729 compared to $43,003, a difference of 35.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $99,093, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $38,436, a difference of 9.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $52,672, a difference of 12.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $57,975, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 125.0%), family poverty (16.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 98.0%), and male poverty (19.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 81.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.7%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 25.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 39.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 225.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 214.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (13.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 212.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 11.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 47.3%), average family size (3.82 compared to 3.07, a difference of 24.4%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.5%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 40.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 32.5%), bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 28.3%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.26%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and nursery school (99.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 51.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 24.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (13.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.8%).