Immigrants from Australia vs Immigrants from Lebanon Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,976,588 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.772. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.253% in Immigrants from Lebanon. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 253.0 Immigrants from Lebanon.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $46,938, a difference of 23.5%), median male earnings ($67,634 compared to $58,835, a difference of 15.0%), and median family income ($126,620 compared to $110,159, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.4%), householder income over 65 years ($69,164 compared to $64,521, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($119,308 compared to $108,471, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 49.7%), family poverty (7.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 24.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.74%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 0.46%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 9.8%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and family households (61.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 63.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 6.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 31.8%), professional degree (6.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 26.4%), and doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.3%), ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.32%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.47%), and male disability (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.3%).