Immigrants from Bahamas vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,844,309 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Immigrant from Bahamas communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.140. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bahamas within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bahamas corresponds to a decrease of 15.4 Immigrants from Malaysia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,910 compared to $107,650, a difference of 40.0%), median male earnings ($45,176 compared to $62,121, a difference of 37.5%), and median family income ($84,732 compared to $115,880, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,793 compared to $54,179, a difference of 18.3%), householder income over 65 years ($53,174 compared to $65,497, a difference of 23.2%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 24.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 51.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 45.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 4.4%), single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 14.0%), and single female poverty (22.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 50.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (40.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 46.6%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 41.1%), and divorced or separated (13.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.54%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 37.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 0.41%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 70.1%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 50.9%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.10%), 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and 3rd grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.9%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 2.8%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.7%).