Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Eritrea Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,530,245 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eritrea within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.370. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Immigrants from Eritrea. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 41.5 Immigrants from Eritrea.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $60,096, a difference of 11.2%), median family income ($92,837 compared to $102,823, a difference of 10.8%), and per capita income ($41,195 compared to $44,509, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $51,574, a difference of 4.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $93,466, a difference of 4.2%), and wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 28.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 26.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (22.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.3% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 33.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 30.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 24.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 9.2%), births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and family households (64.8% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.23%), currently married (43.2% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 0.87%), and married-couple households (42.9% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 124.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 37.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 17.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 29.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 33.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 50.2%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 27.0%), and master's degree (13.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.9%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.51%), male disability (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.70%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 1.5%).