Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Pakistan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 238,699,778 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.279. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Immigrants from Pakistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to an increase of 13.0 Immigrants from Pakistan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,573 compared to $114,434, a difference of 32.2%), median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $60,987, a difference of 31.9%), and median family income ($87,191 compared to $114,406, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $56,789, a difference of 10.4%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 20.3%), and median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $43,052, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (21.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 53.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 53.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 11.0%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 22.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 20.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 41.5%), births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 37.9%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.41 compared to 3.30, a difference of 3.3%), family households (65.0% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.22%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 54.0%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 52.9%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 22.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 5.7%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 8.3%).