Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Yemen Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,980,870 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Yemen within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Yemen. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 2.9 Immigrants from Yemen.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $73,043, a difference of 75.4%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $65,194, a difference of 71.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($127,500 compared to $74,575, a difference of 71.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 21.3%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $43,591, a difference of 42.4%), and median female earnings ($49,818 compared to $34,693, a difference of 43.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 171.2%), family poverty (7.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 140.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 139.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 28.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 43.4%), and single father poverty (14.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 44.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 133.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 115.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 76.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 27.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 31.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 11.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 53.0%), births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 34.3%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 5.1%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.60, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 72.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 45.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 10.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 22.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 34.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 93.8%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 88.1%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 77.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.3% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 1.5%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 71.2%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 45.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (19.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 0.91%, a difference of 4.3%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 11.8%).