Immigrants from Liberia vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,289,833 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Immigrant from Liberia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.320. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Liberia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Liberia corresponds to an increase of 32.5 Immigrants from Australia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,165 compared to $57,953, a difference of 51.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,863 compared to $115,947, a difference of 43.4%), and median family income ($90,450 compared to $126,620, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,981 compared to $56,660, a difference of 18.1%), median female earnings ($37,970 compared to $46,573, a difference of 22.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,967 compared to $69,164, a difference of 28.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 64.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 44.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 35.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 18.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 71.1%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 41.3%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.0% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.13, a difference of 4.7%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 13.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 101.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 88.2%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 66.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.80%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 37.0%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 23.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.6%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 8.9%).