Immigrants from North America vs Nonimmigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,475,038 people shows a near-perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants within Immigrant from North America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.907. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from North America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.725% in Nonimmigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from North America corresponds to a decrease of 724.6 Nonimmigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,302 compared to $40,669, a difference of 21.2%), median family income ($112,151 compared to $96,231, a difference of 16.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,407 compared to $88,301, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 4.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,307 compared to $49,348, a difference of 8.0%), and median female earnings ($41,319 compared to $37,024, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 26.5%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 24.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 16.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.2%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 16.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.94%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 36.7%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 33.8%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.14%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 18.3%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 5.5%).