Immigrants from Peru vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,758,142 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Immigrant from Peru communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Peru within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Peru corresponds to an increase of 10.9 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($56,384 compared to $51,247, a difference of 10.0%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and median household income ($89,010 compared to $85,797, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($47,025 compared to $46,916, a difference of 0.23%), median family income ($103,534 compared to $104,282, a difference of 0.72%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,173 compared to $102,261, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 27.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (15.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.17%), female poverty (13.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and poverty (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 26.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 13.8%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.2% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 19.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.2%), family households (67.2% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.33%), married-couple households (47.3% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.58%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 19.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 44.2%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.3%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 21.4%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 18.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.36%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.5%).