Immigrants from Russia vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,547,882 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.065. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to a decrease of 3.9 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,044 compared to $36,631, a difference of 42.1%), median household income ($96,378 compared to $70,539, a difference of 36.6%), and median male earnings ($63,326 compared to $46,368, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 5.6%), householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $47,015, a difference of 18.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $53,847, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 56.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 48.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 100.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 44.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 28.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 58.0%), births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 57.0%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.040%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (63.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 59.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 42.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 27.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 74.2%), master's degree (19.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 69.9%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 65.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.3% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 74.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 51.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.1%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.7%).