Immigrants from Switzerland vs Scandinavian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,384,608 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians within Immigrant from Switzerland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.483. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Switzerland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.402% in Scandinavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Switzerland corresponds to an increase of 401.9 Scandinavians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,866 compared to $43,848, a difference of 25.1%), median family income ($120,726 compared to $104,410, a difference of 15.6%), and median male earnings ($63,944 compared to $55,527, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,528 compared to $52,654, a difference of 1.7%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,934 compared to $102,969, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 16.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.35%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.66%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 35.5%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 22.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.96%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.0%), family households with children (25.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.19%), births to unmarried women (28.6% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 75.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 35.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 28.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 68.5%), professional degree (7.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 67.2%), and master's degree (20.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.1% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 39.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age over 75 (45.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.8%).