Immigrants from Thailand vs South American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,460,228 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Immigrant from Thailand communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.588. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Thailand within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.059% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Thailand corresponds to an increase of 58.6 South American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,337 compared to $96,497, a difference of 5.7%), median household income ($83,327 compared to $87,446, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,645 compared to $52,979, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 0.84%), median earnings ($45,598 compared to $46,952, a difference of 3.0%), and median male earnings ($52,908 compared to $54,508, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and single female poverty (22.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.63%), single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.56%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.5%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and births to unmarried women (32.8% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.11%), currently married (45.4% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 0.83%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 26.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.7%), master's degree (14.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 12.2%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.33%), 8th grade (94.8% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and 10th grade (92.8% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.6%).