Laotian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,120,790 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.311. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.761% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to a decrease of 761.1 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,041 compared to $54,264, a difference of 15.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $119,756, a difference of 14.1%), and median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $67,353, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income over 65 years ($66,306 compared to $69,174, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $57,931, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.53%), poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.060%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.83%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.8%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 15.4%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.050%), currently married (47.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.92%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 67.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 13.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 33.8%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 28.3%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.0%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and 11th grade (92.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 27.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 16.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.1%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.4%).