Luxembourger vs Cambodian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cambodian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Cambodians

Excellent
Exceptional
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,346
SOCIAL INDEX
90.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
19th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cambodian Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,652,900 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Cambodians within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.220. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Cambodians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to a decrease of 26.2 Cambodians.
Luxembourger Integration in Cambodian Communities

Luxembourger vs Cambodian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $51,731, a difference of 13.3%), median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $45,014, a difference of 12.8%), and median earnings ($47,640 compared to $53,386, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 6.1%), householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $66,892, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $107,148, a difference of 10.2%).
Luxembourger vs Cambodian Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerCambodian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Exceptional
$51,731
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Exceptional
$117,780
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Exceptional
$96,324
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Exceptional
$53,386
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Exceptional
$62,516
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Exceptional
$45,014
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Exceptional
$55,571
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Exceptional
$107,148
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Exceptional
$114,342
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Exceptional
$66,892
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Average
25.8%

Luxembourger vs Cambodian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 15.9%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 13.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (14.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.93%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 3.6%).
Luxembourger vs Cambodian Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerCambodian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
14.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
14.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.8%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Fair
16.4%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Exceptional
27.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.5%

Luxembourger vs Cambodian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.55%).
Luxembourger vs Cambodian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerCambodian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%

Luxembourger vs Cambodian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 22.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 0.97%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 1.0%).
Luxembourger vs Cambodian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerCambodian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
67.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Exceptional
81.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Good
37.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Exceptional
86.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
84.1%

Luxembourger vs Cambodian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.2%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 10.3%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.10 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.3%).
Luxembourger vs Cambodian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerCambodian
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
61.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
26.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Exceptional
26.7%

Luxembourger vs Cambodian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 103.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 6.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 10.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 17.6%).
Luxembourger vs Cambodian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerCambodian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
53.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
5.5%

Luxembourger vs Cambodian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 32.6%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 30.3%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.38%).
Luxembourger vs Cambodian Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerCambodian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Exceptional
88.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Exceptional
47.2%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Exceptional
20.0%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
2.6%

Luxembourger vs Cambodian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.5%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 14.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.47%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.88%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
Luxembourger vs Cambodian Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerCambodian
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Good
11.1%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Exceptional
21.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Fair
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%