Native/Alaskan vs French Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,698,784 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of French within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.347. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in French. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to a decrease of 12.7 French.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and French communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $43,685, a difference of 31.3%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $102,368, a difference of 26.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,816 compared to $99,824, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $51,230, a difference of 7.4%), median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $38,457, a difference of 13.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $59,656, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and French communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 88.7%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 72.8%), and receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 61.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 19.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 22.8%), and single father poverty (22.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and French communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 55.3%), male unemployment (7.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 53.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.79%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and French communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and French communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 35.2%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 33.6%), and births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.0%), family households (66.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and French communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 41.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 18.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and French communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 51.4%), master's degree (9.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 44.6%), and professional degree (3.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.63%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and French communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (30.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 27.1%), vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and female disability (14.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 6.3%).