Norwegian vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,151,904 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.273. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 10.7 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $88,390, a difference of 17.3%), householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $45,764, a difference of 16.1%), and median family income ($106,144 compared to $91,926, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.0%), median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $36,034, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,104 compared to $55,677, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 46.6%), family poverty (6.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 41.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.6%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 14.9%), and single female poverty (20.8% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 31.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 30.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 18.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.4% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.4%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 10.9%), and births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.24%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 35.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.2%), associate's degree (47.6% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 14.9%), and bachelor's degree (37.5% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 31.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 26.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 7.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 9.0%).