South African vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,093,092 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within South African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.068. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South Africans corresponds to an increase of 22.2 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South African and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,383 compared to $53,294, a difference of 3.7%), householder income over 65 years ($65,652 compared to $67,333, a difference of 2.6%), and median household income ($93,379 compared to $95,146, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($61,460 compared to $61,199, a difference of 0.43%), median earnings ($50,752 compared to $51,246, a difference of 0.97%), and per capita income ($50,044 compared to $50,575, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South African and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and single male poverty (12.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.38%), poverty (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South African and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South African and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.23%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South African and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.8%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.3% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.090%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South African and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.80%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.080%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South African and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.0%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and professional degree (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South African and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.20%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.65%).