Tohono O'odham vs Guatemalan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Guatemalan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Guatemalans
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Guatemalan Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,131,232 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.530. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 10.1 Guatemalans.
Tohono O'odham vs Guatemalan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $37,766, a difference of 24.8%), median household income ($61,663 compared to $75,961, a difference of 23.2%), and median family income ($72,193 compared to $88,295, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $35,695, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $54,526, a difference of 11.0%).
Income Metric | Tohono O'odham | Guatemalan |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,256 | Tragic $37,766 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $72,193 | Tragic $88,295 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $61,663 | Tragic $75,961 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,349 | Tragic $41,205 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $39,543 | Tragic $46,736 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,205 | Tragic $35,695 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,248 | Poor $51,525 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $69,068 | Tragic $82,331 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,774 | Tragic $87,705 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $49,121 | Tragic $54,526 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.1% | Exceptional 22.6% |
Tohono O'odham vs Guatemalan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 74.1%), male poverty (22.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 65.7%), and poverty (24.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 59.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 29.4%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 30.8%), and single father poverty (22.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 32.3%).
Poverty Metric | Tohono O'odham | Guatemalan |
Poverty | Tragic 24.4% | Tragic 15.3% |
Families | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Tragic 22.9% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 31.0% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 24.7% | Tragic 16.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 29.5% | Tragic 21.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 31.7% | Tragic 21.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Tragic 21.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Tragic 21.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 34.2% | Tragic 23.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 22.0% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.0% | Tragic 32.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 7.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.1% | Tragic 14.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 14.4% |
Tohono O'odham vs Guatemalan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 80.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 77.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 69.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Tohono O'odham | Guatemalan |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Tragic 10.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 6.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 22.1% | Tragic 18.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.5% | Poor 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.8% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 10.2% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Tohono O'odham vs Guatemalan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 13.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 8.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tohono O'odham | Guatemalan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.2% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 70.4% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.3% | Tragic 35.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 68.6% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 77.5% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 77.7% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.1% | Tragic 83.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 75.1% | Tragic 81.2% |
Tohono O'odham vs Guatemalan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 34.3%), single father households (3.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 29.0%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (67.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 3.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Tohono O'odham | Guatemalan |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 65.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Exceptional 28.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 37.9% | Tragic 43.3% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.53 | Exceptional 3.40 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.8% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Tragic 36.8% | Tragic 42.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Fair 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 49.8% | Tragic 37.1% |
Tohono O'odham vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 42.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 4.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Guatemalan |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.6% | Poor 11.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.7% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 50.0% | Tragic 54.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.9% | Excellent 20.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Tohono O'odham vs Guatemalan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 49.6%), bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 27.0%), and professional degree (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (82.1% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.11%), 12th grade, no diploma (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and ged/equivalency (77.5% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Tohono O'odham | Guatemalan |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 3.5% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Tragic 96.6% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Tragic 96.5% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.8% | Tragic 96.5% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Tragic 96.3% |
3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Tragic 96.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 95.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 94.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Tragic 94.2% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Tragic 91.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Tragic 91.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Tragic 89.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.1% | Tragic 87.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.6% | Tragic 86.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.7% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.1% | Tragic 82.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 77.5% | Tragic 78.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 52.8% | Tragic 56.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 47.1% | Tragic 51.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 31.8% | Tragic 38.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 24.4% | Tragic 31.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 11.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.4% |
Tohono O'odham vs Guatemalan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 78.6%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 48.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 8.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.8%), and disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 15.7%).
Disability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Guatemalan |
Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.0% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.2% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 36.0% | Tragic 25.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.7% | Tragic 49.0% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.7% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 2.6% |