Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
1,572
SOCIAL INDEX
13.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
298th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Trinidadian and Tobagonian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,580,402 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.257. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Trinidadians and Tobagonians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Trinidadians and Tobagonians corresponds to a decrease of 9.1 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 41.1%), per capita income ($41,655 compared to $51,770, a difference of 24.3%), and median family income ($94,466 compared to $116,165, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,631 compared to $54,352, a difference of 3.3%), median female earnings ($40,958 compared to $43,571, a difference of 6.4%), and median earnings ($45,820 compared to $52,361, a difference of 14.3%).

Income Metric | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $41,655 | Exceptional $51,770 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $94,466 | Exceptional $116,165 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $80,402 | Exceptional $95,319 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,820 | Exceptional $52,361 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,446 | Exceptional $62,217 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,958 | Exceptional $43,571 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,631 | Exceptional $54,352 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $89,856 | Exceptional $106,888 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $91,357 | Exceptional $111,914 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $55,327 | Exceptional $66,376 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 19.3% | Tragic 27.3% |
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 65.7%), family poverty (10.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 42.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.8%), single father poverty (17.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.7%).

Poverty Metric | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Poverty | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Families | Tragic 10.9% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.8% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 13.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Single Females | Fair 21.2% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.0% | Good 16.2% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.6% | Exceptional 27.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.9% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.0% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.95%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.6%).

Unemployment Metric | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 14.6% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 22.6% | Fair 17.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.9% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.5% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.6% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.2% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Poor 9.1% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.2% |
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 18.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

Labor Participation Metric | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.1% | Poor 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.0% | Excellent 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 30.9% | Average 36.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.5% | Average 75.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.9% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.5% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Good 84.5% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 45.0%), births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 28.4%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.30%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 0.65%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.5%).

Family Structure Metric | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Family Households | Tragic 63.6% | Tragic 63.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Tragic 26.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 40.9% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.5% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.5% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 101.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.3% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 15.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 32.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 35.7%).

Vehicle Availability Metric | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 23.7% | Tragic 11.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 76.3% | Tragic 88.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 40.9% | Tragic 54.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 54.6%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 45.7%), and no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.83%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.85%).

Education Level Metric | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.7% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.7% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.4% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.1% | Exceptional 93.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.4% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 86.9% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.0% | Exceptional 87.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.1% | Exceptional 69.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.8% | Exceptional 64.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.6% | Exceptional 51.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.7% | Exceptional 44.0% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.4% | Exceptional 18.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 4.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 24.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.61%), disability (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.2%).

Disability Metric | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Disability | Average 11.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Excellent 11.0% | Excellent 10.9% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Poor 5.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 23.9% | Exceptional 21.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.7% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.4% |