Uruguayan vs South African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,288,256 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.128. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in South Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 22.6 South Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and South African communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($53,680 compared to $61,460, a difference of 14.5%), per capita income ($44,318 compared to $50,044, a difference of 12.9%), and median family income ($100,656 compared to $113,229, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $51,383, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($39,228 compared to $41,825, a difference of 6.6%), and median earnings ($46,190 compared to $50,752, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and South African communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 18.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 17.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.65%), single female poverty (20.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and South African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.43%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and South African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.68%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and South African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.99%), family households (64.5% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.17, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and South African communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.3%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and South African communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.3%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.4%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and South African communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 10.8%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.37%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.67%).