Alaska Native vs Malaysian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Alaska Native
✖
Malaysian
✖
Ambulatory Disability
✖
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Alaska Natives
Malaysians
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
29.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
28.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaska Native vs Malaysian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,753,099 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,050,790 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.071 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 0.10%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaska Native | Malaysian |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 15.1% | 16.3% |
| Range | 13.8% | 15.2% |
| Mean | 6.5% | 7.1% |
| Median | 6.5% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Alaska Natives and Malaysians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaska Natives are Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Western Europe (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Guatemala (6.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (6.2%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Polish (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Western Europe (6.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (6.2%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
| Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |