Bangladeshi vs Immigrants from Iraq Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Immigrants from Iraq
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Bangladeshis
Immigrants from Iraq
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
14.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
14.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Immigrants from Iraq Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,368,014 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.173 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,765,362 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iraq and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 0.020%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bangladeshi | Immigrants from Iraq |
Minimum | 3.4% | 3.7% |
Maximum | 15.6% | 11.5% |
Range | 12.2% | 7.8% |
Mean | 7.0% | 6.6% |
Median | 6.5% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 7.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and Immigrants from Iraq by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Alsatian (6.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Iraq are Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Alsatian (6.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |