Bolivian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability
COMPARE
Bolivian
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Disability
Disability Comparison
Bolivians
Immigrants from Hong Kong
10.0%
DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.0%
DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,660,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.020 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,995,136 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.146 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 0.30%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bolivian | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
Minimum | 1.7% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 23.5% | 15.7% |
Range | 21.8% | 11.7% |
Mean | 9.8% | 9.4% |
Median | 9.1% | 9.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 10.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Bolivians and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from Singapore (10.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (9.9%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from China (10.1%, a difference of 1.1%), Iranian (10.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and Immigrants from Israel (10.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Singapore (10.0%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from China (10.1%, a difference of 0.81%), Iranian (10.1%, a difference of 0.82%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (9.9%, a difference of 0.84%), and Immigrants from Israel (10.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.4% |