Brazilian vs Creek Vision Disability
COMPARE
Brazilian
Creek
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Brazilians
Creek
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
62.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Creek Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,719,841 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.324 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,415,520 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 49.1%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Brazilian | Creek |
| Minimum | 0.54% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 8.2% | 11.5% |
| Range | 7.7% | 10.8% |
| Mean | 2.5% | 4.5% |
| Median | 2.1% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 2.3% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Brazilians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Africa (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from England (2.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Iraq (2.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (2.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and Icelander (2.1%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Iraqis | 67.7 /100 | #161 | Good 2.1% |
| Hungarians | 67.4 /100 | #162 | Good 2.1% |
| Icelanders | 66.1 /100 | #163 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 65.5 /100 | #164 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 64.8 /100 | #165 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 62.6 /100 | #167 | Good 2.1% |
| Brazilians | 62.2 /100 | #168 | Good 2.1% |
| South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% |
| Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
| Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
| Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |