Brazilian vs Sri Lankan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Brazilian
Sri Lankan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Brazilians
Sri Lankans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
78.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Sri Lankan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,867,149 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.115 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,283,716 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.87%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Brazilian | Sri Lankan |
| Minimum | 0.82% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 7.3% | 29.8% |
| Range | 6.5% | 28.7% |
| Mean | 3.1% | 4.0% |
| Median | 2.9% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.3% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.65% | 0.71% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Sri Lankans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |