British vs Costa Rican Vision Disability
COMPARE
British
Costa Rican
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
British
Costa Ricans
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
25.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
193rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
40.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
182nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Costa Rican Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 530,471,861 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,497,093 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 1.1%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | British | Costa Rican |
Minimum | 0.53% | 0.38% |
Maximum | 64.6% | 8.8% |
Range | 64.1% | 8.4% |
Mean | 7.1% | 2.1% |
Median | 3.0% | 2.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 1.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.6% | 2.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 0.84% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.7% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to British and Costa Ricans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to British are European (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Canadian (2.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Barbados (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Western Europe (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Uruguayan (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from North America (2.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Oceania (2.2%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% |
Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |
Moroccans | 35.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 33.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 2.2% |
Native Hawaiians | 33.3 /100 | #186 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 30.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 2.2% |
Guyanese | 28.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 2.2% |
Salvadorans | 27.4 /100 | #189 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 26.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 2.2% |
Canadians | 25.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 2.2% |
Europeans | 25.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.2% |
British | 25.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |