Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Immigrants from Malaysia
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Central American Indians
Immigrants from Malaysia
18.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
293rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.1%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
79.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,115,408 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.418 and weighted average of 18.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,973,854 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.134 and weighted average of 17.1%, a difference of 6.3%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American Indian | Immigrants from Malaysia |
Minimum | 8.5% | 3.5% |
Maximum | 29.6% | 33.4% |
Range | 21.0% | 29.9% |
Mean | 18.4% | 16.4% |
Median | 18.1% | 15.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.1% | 13.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.4% | 18.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Iroquois (18.2%, a difference of 0.010%), British West Indian (18.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Ottawa (18.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Africa (18.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Native/Alaskan (18.1%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Kenyans | 0.1 /100 | #286 | Tragic 18.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #287 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #288 | Tragic 18.1% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.1 /100 | #289 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 0.1 /100 | #290 | Tragic 18.1% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #291 | Tragic 18.2% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #292 | Tragic 18.2% |
Central American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #293 | Tragic 18.2% |
British West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #294 | Tragic 18.2% |
German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 18.2% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 18.3% |
Japanese | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 18.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 18.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Brazilian (17.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Sri Lankan (17.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (17.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Australia (17.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (17.1%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Scotch-Irish | 85.9 /100 | #147 | Excellent 17.1% |
French Canadians | 85.7 /100 | #148 | Excellent 17.1% |
Cypriots | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 17.1% |
Basques | 85.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 17.1% |
Syrians | 83.0 /100 | #151 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 82.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 79.3 /100 | #154 | Good 17.1% |
Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% |
Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |
Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% |
Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |