Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Syria Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Immigrants from Syria
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Central American Indians
Immigrants from Syria
7.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
84.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Syria Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,071,152 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.616 and weighted average of 7.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,106,838 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Syria and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 19.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American Indian | Immigrants from Syria |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 32.9% | 14.1% |
| Range | 30.3% | 12.1% |
| Mean | 9.9% | 6.3% |
| Median | 7.4% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 2.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Immigrants from Dominican Republic (7.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Ottawa (7.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Shoshone (7.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Blackfeet (7.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Yemen (7.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 7.3% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 7.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Syria by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Syria are Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Hungary (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |