Chickasaw vs Dutch West Indian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Dutch West Indian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Chickasaw
Dutch West Indians
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Dutch West Indian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,756,307 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.110 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 0.91%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Dutch West Indian |
| Minimum | 0.33% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 15.2% | 9.9% |
| Range | 14.8% | 8.4% |
| Mean | 5.4% | 5.0% |
| Median | 4.6% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Dutch West Indians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 2.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch West Indians are Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and Cheyenne (3.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |