Chickasaw vs Guatemalan Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Guatemalan
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Chickasaw
Guatemalans
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
14.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Guatemalan Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,666,878 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,236,558 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.166 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 38.0%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Guatemalan |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 51.4% | 32.3% |
| Range | 49.5% | 30.4% |
| Mean | 23.7% | 12.2% |
| Median | 21.4% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.1% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.8% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 4.9% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Pima (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.0%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and Colville (15.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Native Hawaiian (11.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Ghanaian (11.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Slavic (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), European (11.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and Nigerian (11.6%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 17.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 17.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 11.6% |
| British | 17.0 /100 | #203 | Poor 11.6% |
| Nigerians | 16.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.6% |
| Slavs | 15.5 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 14.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.7% |
| Ghanaians | 14.8 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.7% |
| Guatemalans | 14.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 11.7% |
| Europeans | 13.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 11.7% |
| Belgians | 13.1 /100 | #210 | Poor 11.7% |
| Canadians | 13.0 /100 | #211 | Poor 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 11.8 /100 | #212 | Poor 11.7% |
| Yugoslavians | 11.6 /100 | #213 | Poor 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 11.4 /100 | #214 | Poor 11.7% |
| Spanish American Indians | 11.1 /100 | #215 | Poor 11.7% |