Chinese vs Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Chinese
Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Chinese
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
250th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
2.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
232nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,795,509 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,309,207 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.170 and weighted average of 6.4%, a difference of 1.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac |
| Minimum | 0.26% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 17.0% | 12.1% |
| Range | 16.8% | 9.7% |
| Mean | 7.3% | 6.2% |
| Median | 6.6% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.1% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Native Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Portugal (6.5%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Cuba (6.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and Armenian (6.5%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs are Subsaharan African (6.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Liberia (6.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Hispanic or Latino (6.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Dutch (6.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and Panamanian (6.4%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Panamanians | 3.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 2.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Dutch | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Haitians | 1.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Senegalese | 1.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 1.6 /100 | #241 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Spaniards | 1.6 /100 | #242 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Germans | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Armenians | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Chinese | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Hawaiians | 0.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 6.5% |