Chinese vs Creek Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Chinese
Creek
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Chinese
Creek
15.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.3%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
300th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Creek Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,450,672 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.031 and weighted average of 18.3%, a difference of 14.7%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Creek |
Minimum | 10.5% | 5.7% |
Maximum | 30.0% | 28.9% |
Range | 19.5% | 23.2% |
Mean | 16.3% | 17.7% |
Median | 16.1% | 18.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.9% | 16.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.3% | 19.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 3.5% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (15.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Lithuania (16.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.0%, a difference of 0.59%), Thai (16.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and Immigrants from Ireland (16.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 15.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 15.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.0% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 16.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 16.2% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 16.2% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 16.2% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 16.2% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Immigrants | Austria | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Ghanaian (18.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Blackfeet (18.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Japanese (18.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ghana (18.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (18.2%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Central American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #293 | Tragic 18.2% |
British West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #294 | Tragic 18.2% |
German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 18.2% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 18.3% |
Japanese | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 18.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 18.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 18.3% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 18.3% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 18.3% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 18.3% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.3% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.3% |