Creek vs Chippewa Male Disability
COMPARE
Creek
Chippewa
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Creek
Chippewa
15.5%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Chippewa Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,460,797 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.301 and weighted average of 15.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,038,110 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.086 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 8.8%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Creek | Chippewa |
Minimum | 4.5% | 3.1% |
Maximum | 52.5% | 34.5% |
Range | 48.1% | 31.4% |
Mean | 21.9% | 18.9% |
Median | 20.7% | 18.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.3% | 15.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.6% | 22.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Creek and Chippewa by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Puerto Rican (15.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Tsimshian (15.6%, a difference of 0.45%), Kiowa (15.4%, a difference of 0.66%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 0.85%), and Lumbee (15.2%, a difference of 2.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Potawatomi (14.2%, a difference of 0.43%), Native/Alaskan (14.2%, a difference of 0.53%), Cajun (14.4%, a difference of 0.57%), Navajo (14.4%, a difference of 0.81%), and Ottawa (14.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 14.1% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 14.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.3% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.4% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.4% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.5% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 15.6% |