Croatian vs Lebanese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Croatian
Lebanese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Croatians
Lebanese
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
51.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
173rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
66.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Croatian vs Lebanese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,651,055 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.525 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 401,495,735 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 0.84%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Croatian | Lebanese |
Minimum | 1.5% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 32.1% | 27.5% |
Range | 30.6% | 25.3% |
Mean | 8.8% | 8.4% |
Median | 7.4% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 8.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Croatians and Lebanese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Canada (6.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Moroccan (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ecuador (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Vietnamese (6.1%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lebanese are Nigerian (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Basque (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Belarus (6.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Nicaraguan (6.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |