Crow vs Central American Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Crow
Central American
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Crow
Central Americans
6.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
295th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
69.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow vs Central American Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,204,118 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Crow and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.303 and weighted average of 6.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,305,341 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.287 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 14.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Crow | Central American |
| Minimum | 4.4% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 20.2% | 10.3% |
| Range | 15.8% | 9.0% |
| Mean | 8.4% | 5.5% |
| Median | 7.4% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.5% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 1.5% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Crow by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Cape Verdean (6.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Alaskan Athabascan (6.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (6.9%, a difference of 0.26%), French American Indian (6.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Grenada (6.9%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.9% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.9% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Belarus (6.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Latvia (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Northern European (6.0%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |