Czechoslovakian vs Indonesian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Indonesian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Indonesians
6.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
3.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
9.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Indonesian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,636,980 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.721 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,682,177 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indonesians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 1.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Indonesian |
| Minimum | 0.94% | 0.59% |
| Maximum | 50.5% | 10.8% |
| Range | 49.6% | 10.2% |
| Mean | 10.8% | 6.3% |
| Median | 7.7% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Indonesians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Portuguese (6.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Cuban (6.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Mexican (6.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Panamanian (6.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and Slavic (6.4%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indonesians are Immigrants from Albania (6.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Hungarian (6.3%, a difference of 0.050%), German Russian (6.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Guamanian/Chamorro (6.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% |
| German Russians | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 7.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Liberians | 7.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hondurans | 6.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Slavs | 5.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Cubans | 4.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Portuguese | 4.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 3.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Mexicans | 3.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Panamanians | 3.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 2.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 6.4% |