Ecuadorian vs Malaysian Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Malaysian
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Ecuadorians
Malaysians
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
4.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.5%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
7.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Malaysian Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,436,326 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.421 and weighted average of 2.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,907,967 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.176 and weighted average of 2.5%, a difference of 0.62%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ecuadorian | Malaysian |
| Minimum | 0.65% | 0.090% |
| Maximum | 3.5% | 9.5% |
| Range | 2.9% | 9.4% |
| Mean | 2.3% | 3.0% |
| Median | 2.4% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.89% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.64% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.63% | 1.7% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Malaysians by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Honduras (2.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Thailand (2.6%, a difference of 0.050%), White/Caucasian (2.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Celtic (2.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Samoan (2.6%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Central American (2.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Panamanian (2.5%, a difference of 0.23%), French (2.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Alaskan Athabascan (2.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Russia (2.5%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 12.9 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.5% |
| Slovaks | 12.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 12.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 11.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 11.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.5% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 10.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.5% |
| French | 9.9 /100 | #207 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Central Americans | 8.7 /100 | #208 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Malaysians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Panamanians | 6.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 5.1 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Samoans | 5.1 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Ecuadorians | 4.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 4.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 4.4 /100 | #216 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Celtics | 4.4 /100 | #217 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Scotch-Irish | 4.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 4.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Hondurans | 3.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 2.6% |