German Russian vs Creek Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
German Russian
Creek
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
German Russians
Creek
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
9.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
German Russian vs Creek Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,455,793 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of German Russians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 34.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | German Russian | Creek |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 18.8% | 30.8% |
| Range | 16.5% | 28.5% |
| Mean | 7.4% | 12.5% |
| Median | 6.5% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to German Russians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to German Russians are Immigrants from Albania (6.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (6.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Guamanian/Chamorro (6.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% |
| German Russians | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 7.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Liberians | 7.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hondurans | 6.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Slavs | 5.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Cubans | 4.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Portuguese | 4.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 3.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |