Ghanaian vs Armenian Male Disability
COMPARE
Ghanaian
Armenian
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Ghanaians
Armenians
10.8%
MALE DISABILITY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
90.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ghanaian vs Armenian Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,687,278 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,935,908 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 0.62%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ghanaian | Armenian |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 5.9% |
| Maximum | 25.9% | 39.5% |
| Range | 24.5% | 33.7% |
| Mean | 11.0% | 12.6% |
| Median | 11.0% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.7% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Ghanaians and Armenians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (10.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Uruguay (10.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants (10.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Central American (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Uganda (10.8%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Cuba (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Eastern European (10.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Africa (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Ghana (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 95.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 94.9 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 94.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 94.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 94.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 93.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 93.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Ghanaians | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Central Americans | 92.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 91.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Eastern Europeans | 90.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |