Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Hungary Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Ghanaian
Immigrants from Hungary
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Ghanaians
Immigrants from Hungary
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
71.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
83.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Hungary Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,643,390 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.060 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,671,605 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.868 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 1.0%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ghanaian | Immigrants from Hungary |
Minimum | 0.61% | 0.66% |
Maximum | 15.7% | 32.0% |
Range | 15.1% | 31.3% |
Mean | 5.8% | 6.8% |
Median | 5.7% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.6% | 7.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ghanaians and Immigrants from Hungary by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Northern European (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Scotland (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Croatia (6.0%, a difference of 0.26%), Syrian (6.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Austria (6.0%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hungary are Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |