Ghanaian vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Ghanaian
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Ghanaians
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
2.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ghanaian vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,612,767 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165 and weighted average of 2.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,769,787 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.136 and weighted average of 2.5%, a difference of 2.2%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ghanaian | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
| Minimum | 0.32% | 0.42% |
| Maximum | 7.9% | 3.5% |
| Range | 7.5% | 3.1% |
| Mean | 2.6% | 2.2% |
| Median | 2.5% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 1.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.92% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 0.74% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 0.74% |
Demographics Similar to Ghanaians and Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Immigrants from Sierra Leone (2.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Bolivia (2.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Thai (2.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Dominican (2.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (2.6%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Sierra Leonean (2.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (2.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Ecuadorian (2.5%, a difference of 0.54%), Barbadian (2.5%, a difference of 0.85%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (2.5%, a difference of 0.86%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Vietnamese | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| British West Indians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Barbadians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Dominicans | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Thais | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Ghanaians | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 99.7 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 2.6% |