Immigrants from Argentina vs Bulgarian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Argentina
Bulgarian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Argentina
Bulgarians
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Argentina vs Bulgarian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 264,391,050 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.089 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,613,194 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.138 and weighted average of 5.6%, a difference of 0.19%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Argentina | Bulgarian |
Minimum | 1.8% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 14.0% | 12.9% |
Range | 12.2% | 11.6% |
Mean | 5.7% | 5.7% |
Median | 5.4% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 6.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Argentina and Bulgarians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Argentina are Immigrants from Japan (5.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sweden (5.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Egyptian (5.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Indonesia (5.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and Paraguayan (5.5%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Egyptian (5.6%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Japan (5.6%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Sweden (5.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Luxembourger (5.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (5.5%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |