Immigrants from Australia vs Burmese Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Burmese
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Burmese
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.8%
VISION DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Australia vs Burmese Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,117,952 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.639 and weighted average of 1.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,767,032 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.089 and weighted average of 1.8%, a difference of 5.4%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Australia | Burmese |
| Minimum | 0.16% | 0.21% |
| Maximum | 12.7% | 5.6% |
| Range | 12.6% | 5.4% |
| Mean | 3.1% | 1.6% |
| Median | 2.1% | 1.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 1.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.3% | 1.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 0.43% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 0.68% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 0.67% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia and Burmese by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Turkey (1.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Egypt (1.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Cambodian (2.0%, a difference of 0.35%), Luxembourger (1.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and Mongolian (1.9%, a difference of 0.80%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Indian (Asian) (1.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Bolivian (1.9%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (1.9%, a difference of 1.7%), Asian (1.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and Turkish (1.9%, a difference of 3.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.0% |