Immigrants from Cameroon vs Ugandan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cameroon
✖
Ugandan
✖
Ambulatory Disability
✖
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Cameroon
Ugandans
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cameroon vs Ugandan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,739,199 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cameroon and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.342 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,018,396 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 0.43%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Cameroon | Ugandan |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 13.7% | 14.2% |
| Range | 10.8% | 12.8% |
| Mean | 5.9% | 5.7% |
| Median | 5.6% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cameroon and Ugandans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cameroon are Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Peru (5.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from South Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and Sudanese (5.7%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Eastern European (5.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Palestinian (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Chilean (5.7%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |